What we do
Quartania works on the reasoning behind the maintenance plan — producing it, governing it, and building the systems that keep it. Three service lines below. In practice most engagements pull on more than one of them.
The common thread is defensibility. Whether the plan is any good is a matter of judgement and you probably have that covered. Whether you can show why it is what it is, to someone who was not in the room, is the bit that comes apart. An audit, a cost challenge, a migration and a resignation are all that same question in different clothes.
Reliability engineering
FMECA and RCM facilitation, failure analysis, maintenance strategy review and PM justification. The analysis itself, done by someone who has run the workshops.
- FMEA / FMECA facilitation
- RCM and PM optimisation
- Failure investigation
- Maintenance strategy review
Asset management
Criticality frameworks, lifecycle planning and ISO 55001 readiness — the governance layer that makes reliability decisions auditable rather than merely correct.
- Asset criticality frameworks
- ISO 55001 gap analysis
- Lifecycle cost and renewal planning
- Audit and review preparation
Custom software
Bespoke asset and maintenance data systems, built around how your team actually works and what your EAM will never hold.
- Asset and maintenance data systems
- CMMS/EAM data extraction and migration
- Reporting nobody has to rebuild monthly
- Integration with SAP, Maximo and Ellipse
The software half
Consulting deliverables decay. A criticality study handed over as a spreadsheet is current the day it is signed and drifting by the end of the quarter. Nobody neglects it. There is just nowhere for it to live that anyone owns.
That is why we build Stannar, the reliability system of record that sits beside SAP, Maximo and Ellipse. You author one FMECA study for an asset class and scope it across the fleet; every adopted criticality carries the study, the engineer and the date that produced it. The asset master and the work orders stay in your EAM — Stannar holds the layer those systems were never built to hold.
Engaging us for consulting does not commit you to the product, and you do not need the product to get value from the consulting. Plenty of work ends with a study, a framework and a recommendation. That is a finished job, not a failed sale.
Not sure which one you need?
Nobody arrives thinking in service categories. They arrive with a date — a review in six weeks, an audit finding to close, a PM budget somebody has started asking about. Tell us the date and we will tell you what the work actually is. Some background on how Quartania works and where we draw the line.
Talk to us